Whitechapel
Famous Last Words
No means perfect, in fact I’ve had accounts banned from NSC. The difference I was about 16 and I can now see that I was acting like a bellend.
A fully grown adult not being able to do that is quite sad, tbh.
[NSC] Should Mustafa II be unbanned?
- Thread starter Mustafa II
- Start date
Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊
- Status
No means perfect, in fact I’ve had accounts banned from NSC. The difference I was about 16 and I can now see that I was acting like a bellend.
A fully grown adult not being able to do that is quite sad, tbh.
NorthLainer
Well-known member
Paraphrasing an esteemed former manager:
"These are a very popcorn-able thread"
"These are a very popcorn-able thread"
- Oct 17, 2008
- 10,863
Had a massive flounce over basically nothing, then insisted that Bozza manually went through and deleted every single one of his posts because NSC was “profiting” from all the “revenue” through clicks that his posts brought in. This included some threads with thousands of posts such as the Netflix one. I understand this was a massive ball ache and very time consuming to do.
Then he just came back under his current username without a word of apology, acted like nothing happened, had several more flounces until he got his account restricted.
And now we’re here.
That boy ain’t right.
Cornwallboy
Active member
- Oct 13, 2022
- 417
Fair point and I totally agree. Mostly political debate involving opposing sides is a waste of time.
Cornwallboy
Active member
- Oct 13, 2022
- 417
Can you prove I'm behind both accounts?
Normal Rob
Well-known member
I feel very let down by NSC, and in particular @Mustafa II . I have read all the way through this thread fully expecting him to be both fully reinstated (tick) and then banned again. It's not happened. Things have changed.
Last edited:
We will put you down as “don’t know”
Better than "two shits of goat knobs" - anyone might think you've been dining out with @Herr Tubthumper .
cjd
Well-known member
Mustapha was never one of my favourite posters and his flounce sometime ago caused a lot of problems for Darren McKay.
I'm really surprised he allowed him to "waltz back on here without an apology" . I'm not sure what this says about the Forum owner...? I have always found the owner to be balanced, fair and incredibly tolerant, but surely there has to be a limit , otherwise it looks like weakness....?
As regards one of the moderators on this particular thread....hmmmmm.
I'm really surprised he allowed him to "waltz back on here without an apology" . I'm not sure what this says about the Forum owner...? I have always found the owner to be balanced, fair and incredibly tolerant, but surely there has to be a limit , otherwise it looks like weakness....?
As regards one of the moderators on this particular thread....hmmmmm.
Peacehaven Wild Kids
Well-known member
Nah, these wet wanks that post a loud of shit 
n here when we lose two on the bounce.
Plenty of good posters outweigh them
n here when we lose two on the bounce.Plenty of good posters outweigh them
No need to go on and on about it
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 9,940
Yes it should. For:
1. Anyone that makes an oh so funny fish pun.
2. Anyone that mention's Leo's penalty.
3. Anyone that starts yet another RDZ thread.
4. That NSCer that starts so many sad shite threads.
Bit presumptuous. You need knocking off your PERCH
KZNSeagull
Well-known member
There is no plaice for this on here
Iggle Piggle
Well-known member
- Sep 3, 2010
- 5,411
No. It really isn't. I'm partial to a long post myself. On occasion, it's worth reading. If every post of some posters, however, is like the recipe for Cheese on Toast bring turned into Dostoevsky then I'm out.
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 9,940
Motogull
Todd Warrior
- Sep 16, 2005
- 9,940
There's a time and plaice for everything
- Status