Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. Skaville

    Lynch to Forest then...

    Well I would suggest that turning down a transfer request kind of rules out your first point. I wouldn't be surprised by the illegal approach, but you still have the current situation of five centre halves (plus Hinsh) for two places. Competition for places is healthy, but there comes a...
  2. Skaville

    Lynch to Forest then...

    Well if that's the case, why didn't they accept his transfer request before the window shut? If we were busily lining up his replacment all summer, surely we would have been willing to let him go in the autumn
  3. Skaville

    Lynch to Forest then...

    One point that was no doubt raised in the previous eleven pages (but here goes anyway)... wasn't it inevitable that there would be some tantrums and fall out amongst the centre halves? El Abd, Elphick and Lynch all performed admirably for the club last year. It was one of the few positions...
  4. Skaville

    Lynch to Forest then...

    Is he not entitled to an opinion? I happen to agree with him. He's quicker, his distribution is better. The main area that Joel needs to develop in his concentration and occaisionally, his decsion making. This will only improve with games. The other issue is that Lynch has time on his side...
  5. Skaville

    Lynch to Forest then...

    Except he was injured at the beginning of the season. Big loss though. Big, big loss. We'll end up getting peanuts for one of our biggest talents. Another negative for Mr Adams. Come on Mickey, sort it out. We're going backwards.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top